New vCISO Client Capacity

 

Exciting News: We Can Now Take on One More vCISO Client!

We’re thrilled to announce that MicroSolved now has the capacity to onboard one more client for our vCISO (virtual Chief Information Security Officer) services! This is a unique opportunity for your organization to gain access to top-tier cybersecurity leadership and expertise without the full-time overhead.

VCISO

Why Choose Our vCISO Services?

In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, businesses face an array of cybersecurity challenges. From sophisticated ransomware attacks to subtle phishing schemes, staying ahead of cyber threats requires expert guidance. Our vCISO services provide:

  • Expertise and Experience: Benefit from seasoned cybersecurity professionals who bring a wealth of knowledge across various industries.
  • Cost-Effective Solutions: Access strategic security leadership without the cost of a full-time executive.
  • Customized Security Strategies: Tailored solutions to meet your specific business needs and objectives.

Get Started with Our Free Whitepaper

To help you understand the full scope and benefits of vCISO services, we’ve prepared an in-depth whitepaper: “Navigating the Complex Landscape of Cybersecurity: How vCISO Services Can Secure Your Business.” This comprehensive guide covers the evolving threat landscape, the role of vCISO services, and real-world case studies demonstrating successful security implementations.

Download Your Copy Today!

Ready to learn more? Download our whitepaper for a deep dive into how vCISO services can transform your cybersecurity strategy. Visit https://signup.microsolved.com/vciso-whitepaper-download/ to get your copy now.

Don’t miss out on this chance to elevate your cybersecurity posture with expert guidance. Act quickly—spaces are limited!

Contact Us

For more information or to discuss how our vCISO services can align with your needs, reach out to us at info@microsolved.com or call (614) 351-1237. We’re here to help you navigate the complex world of cybersecurity and secure your business’s future.

Stay secure,
Brent Huston and the MicroSolved Team


By leveraging our vCISO services, your organization can stay ahead of cyber threats and ensure robust protection for your digital assets. Don’t wait—take the first step today by downloading our whitepaper.

 

* AI tools were used as a research assistant for this content.

 

Reducing The Cost of Security: The vCISO Edge

A Virtual CISO (Chief Information Security Officer) (“vCISO”) is an information security professional who provides guidance and expertise to organizations to help them secure their digital assets. They can help prioritize, plan, and manage security projects and controls to meet security goals. A Virtual CISO can provide valuable insights into current trends and threats, allowing organizations to avoid potential risks while proactively improving their data protection strategies.

Align Efforts with Regulation

A Virtual CISO can help organizations align their security projects and controls with frameworks like the Center for Internet Security (CIS) Controls and various regulatory requirements like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Service Organization Control (SOC2 Type 2). This way, organizations can ensure their data security efforts align with industry best practices and compliance frameworks. By leveraging the knowledge of a vCISO, organizations can avoid costly mistakes that could be made by trying to manage their data security independently.

Align Efforts with Emerging Threats

A vCISO can use their expertise to help organizations stay ahead of emerging threats and tune their security controls accordingly. They can monitor the latest technology and cyber threats trends, and recommend specific controls or strategies to mitigate these risks. In addition, a vCISO can use their understanding of existing security frameworks to ensure that the organization meets its regulatory requirements and follows best practices. This ensures that the organization’s data remains secure while minimizing compliance risks. Furthermore, a vCISO’s experience will provide insight into potential weaknesses in the organization’s security posture, allowing them to prioritize projects and controls for maximum effectiveness.

Comparative Solutions

A Virtual CISO can use their experience and expertise to help organizations solve various security problems quickly and cost-effectively. They can leverage their engagement with other clients to identify the most effective solutions for the organization’s particular needs, often reducing the overall cost of building a security program or integrating new tools and workflows. Through their knowledge of existing security frameworks, regulatory requirements, and emerging threats, Virtual CISOs can develop an understanding of how different solutions fit into an organization’s security infrastructure and make informed decisions about which projects should be implemented first. This allows organizations to maximize their effectiveness in defending against threats while minimizing associated costs.

A Virtual CISO can be an invaluable resource for organizations seeking to secure digital assets while complying with industry and regulatory requirements. With a vCISO, organizations can leverage their expertise to prioritize security projects and controls, align efforts with frameworks like the Center for Internet Security (CIS) Controls and GDPR, and stay on top of emerging threats. To maximize your security posture and minimize associated costs, contact MicroSolved (info(at)microsolved.com) today about their vCISO solutions.

 

* Just to let you know, we used some AI tools to gather the information for this article, and we polished it up with Grammarly to make sure it reads just right!

Maximize Your Cybersecurity: Discover How a Virtual CISO Can Transform Your Business Security Strategy

What is a vCISO?

A vCISO, virtual CISO, or virtual Chief Information Security Officer is a highly qualified cybersecurity expert who provides IT security and compliance services on a contractual basis. Unlike a full-time CISO, a vCISO works remotely and collaborates with an organization’s executive team to protect against security threats and ensure compliance with industry regulations.

As a cybersecurity expert, a vCISO brings years of experience and a wide range of skills. They deeply understand security practices, threat landscapes, and industry standards. With this knowledge, they can assess an organization’s security posture, identify potential gaps and risks, and develop a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy.

A vCISO’s role is to provide unbiased advice and guidance to the organization’s leadership team. They work closely with the executive team to align security objectives with business goals. VCISOs can help establish and implement security policies, compliance standards, and best practices by leveraging their technical expertise and industry knowledge.

By hiring a vCISO on a contractual basis, organizations gain access to a team of experts without the commitment of a full-time hire. This flexible and cost-effective approach allows businesses to benefit from the expertise of a seasoned professional while optimizing their security program. Ultimately, a vCISO helps organizations enhance their security posture and proactively mitigate cyber threats.

What does a virtual Chief Information Security Officer do?

A virtual Chief Information Security Officer (vCISO) plays a critical role in assisting organizations in developing and managing their information security program. One of the primary responsibilities of a vCISO is to create and implement a comprehensive security strategy for the organization. This includes identifying and prioritizing security threats, developing security policies and procedures, and establishing security controls to mitigate risks.

In addition to creating the security strategy, a vCISO coordinates and manages security audits conducted within the organization. They work closely with internal and external auditors to ensure the organization’s security practices and controls meet regulatory requirements and industry standards. This involves conducting risk assessments, reviewing security controls, and implementing necessary changes to enhance the organization’s security posture.

Furthermore, a vCISO evaluates third-party vendors and assesses their security capabilities. They ensure that third parties comply with the organization’s security requirements and implement necessary security measures to protect its data and systems from potential risks.

A crucial part of a vCISO’s role is presenting the organization’s security posture to stakeholders, such as the executive team and board members. They regularly update the organization’s security posture, including identified vulnerabilities or emerging threats. This helps stakeholders make informed decisions regarding the organization’s security investments and priorities.

A vCISO plays a vital role in helping organizations build a robust and effective information security program by fulfilling these responsibilities. They bring their expertise to develop a comprehensive security strategy, coordinate audits, evaluate third parties, and present the organization’s security posture to stakeholders.

Learning More

In conclusion, navigating the complex cybersecurity landscape can be daunting for any organization. However, partnering with a seasoned virtual Chief Information Security Officer (vCISO) can significantly enhance your security posture and ensure compliance with the latest industry standards. This is where MicroSolved comes into play. With our extensive experience and deep expertise in cybersecurity, we offer tailored vCISO services designed to meet your unique needs and challenges. Let us help you fortify your defenses, mitigate risks, and secure your digital assets effectively. Don’t wait for a security breach to realize the importance of expert guidance. Contact MicroSolved today and take a proactive step towards a more secure and resilient future.

 

* Just to let you know, we used some AI tools to gather the information for this article, and we polished it up with Grammarly to make sure it reads just right!

Centralization: The Hidden Trap

Everything is about efficiency and economies of scale now days. Thats all we seem to care about. We build vast power generation plants and happily pay the electrical resistance price to push energy across great distances. We establish large central natural gas pipelines that carry most of the gas that is eventually distributed to our homes and factories. And we establish giant data centers that hold and process enormous amounts of our private and business information; information that if lost or altered could produce immediate adverse impacts on our everyday lives.

Centralization like this has obvious benefits. It allows us to provide more products and services while employing less people. It allows us to build and maintain less facilities and infrastructure while keeping our service levels high. It is simply more efficient and cost effective. But the costthat is more effectivehere is purely rated in dollars. How about the hidden costin these systems that nobody seems to talk about?

What I am referring to here is the vulnerability centralization brings to any system. It is great to pay less for electricity and to avoid some of the local blackouts we used to experience, but how many power plants and transmission towers would an enemy have to take out to cripple the whole grid? How many pipeline segments and pumping stations would an enemy have to destroy to widely interrupt gas delivery? And how many data centers would an enemy need to compromise to gain access to the bulk of our important records? The answer to these questions is: not as many as yesterday, and the number becomes smaller every year.

However, I am not advocating eschewing efficiency and economies of scale; they make life in this overcrowded world better for everyone. What I am saying is that we need to realize the dangers we are putting ourselves in and make plans and infrastructure alterations to cope with attacks and disasters when they come. These kinds of systems need to have built-in redundancies and effective disaster recovery plans if we are to avoid crisis.

Common wisdom tells us that you shouldnt put all your eggs in one basket, and Murphys Law tells us that anything that can go wrong eventually will go wrong. Lets remember these gems of wisdom. That way our progeny cannot say of us: those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it

Thanks to John Davis for this post.

Compliance-Based Infosec Vs Threat-Based Infosec

In the world of Information Security (infosec), there are two main philosophies: compliance-based infosec and threat-based infosec. Compliance-based infosec means meeting a set of written security standards designed to fulfill some goal such as the requirements of statute law or financial information privacy requirements. Threat-based infosec, on the other hand, means applying information security controls in reaction to (or anticipation of) threats that organizations currently (or soon will) face. 

Compliance-based infosec is generally applied smoothly across the organization. In other words, all the security controls mandated in the security standard must be put in place by the organization, and the relative effectiveness of each control is largely ignored. In contrast, security controls are applied in a hierarchical manner in threat-based infosec. The most effective or greatly needed security controls are applied first according to the threats that are most likely to occur or that will cause the most damage to the organization if they do occur. 

The difference is sort of like the defensive strategy of the Chinese versus that of the Normans in post-conquest England. The Chinese built very long walls that went from one end of their territory to the other. Their goal was to keep out all invaders everywhere. This is a grand idea, but takes a very large amount of resources to implement and maintain. In practice, it takes tons of men and infrastructure and the defensive capabilities at any one place are spread thin. The Normans in England, on the other hand, built strong castles with many layers of defense in strategic locations where the threats were greatest and where it was easiest to support neighboring castles. In practice, there are fewer defenses at any one point, but the places where defenses are implemented are very strong indeed. Both of these strategies have merit, and are really driven by the particular set of circumstances faced by the defender. But which is better for your organization? Let’s look at compliance-based infosec first.

Compliance-based infosec, when implemented correctly, is really the best kind of defense there is. The problem is, the only place I’ve ever seen it really done right is in the military. In military information security, failure to protect private information can lead to death and disaster. Because of this, no expense or inconvenience is spared when protecting this information. Everything is compartmentalized and access is strictly based on need to know. Every system and connection is monitored, and there are people watching your every move. There are rules and checklists for everything and failure to comply is severely punished. In addition, finding better ways to protect information are sought after, and those that come up with valuable ideas are generously rewarded.

This is not the way compliance-base infosec works in the private sector, or even in non-military government agencies. First, statute law is tremendously vague when discussing implementing information security. Laws make broad statements such as “personal health information will be protected from unauthorized access or modification”. Fine. So a group of people get together and write up a body of regulations to further spell out the requirements organizations need to meet to comply with the law. Unfortunately, you are still dealing with pretty broad brush strokes here. To try to get a handle on things, agencies and auditors rely on information security standards and guidelines such as are documented in NIST or ISO. From these, baseline standards and requirements are set down. The problems here are many. First, baseline standards are minimums. They are not saying “it’s best if you do this”, they are saying “you will at least do this”. However, typical organizations, (which generally have very limited infosec budgets), take these baseline standards as goals to be strived for, not starting points. They very rarely meet baseline standards, let alone exceed them. Also, NIST and ISO standards are not very timely. The standards are only updated occasionally, and they are not very useful for countering new and rapidly developing threats. So, unless your organization is really serious about information security and has the money and manpower to make it work, I would say compliance-based infosec is not for you. I know that many organizations (such as health care and financial institutions) are required to meet baseline standards, but remember what happened to Target last year. They were found to be compliant with the PCI DSS, but still had tens of millions of financial records compromised.

Now let’s look at threat-based infosec. To implement a threat-based information security program, the organization first looks at the information assets they need to protect, the threats and vulnerabilities that menace them and the consequences that will ensue if those information assets are actually compromised (basic asset inventory and risk assessment). They then prioritize the risks they face and decide how to implement security controls in the most effective and efficient way to counter those particular risks. That might mean implementing strong egress filtering and log monitoring as opposed to buying the fanciest firewall. Or it might mean doing something simple like ensuring that system admins use separate access credentials for simple network access and administrative access to the system. Whatever controls are applied, they are chosen to solve particular problems, not to meet some broad baseline that is designed to meet generally defined problems. Also, threat-based infosec programs are much better at anticipating and preparing for emerging threats, since reassessments of the security program are made whenever there are significant changes in the system or threat picture.

These are the reasons that I think most of us in non-military organizations should go with threat-based infosec programs. Even those organizations that must meet regulatory requirements can ensure that they are spending the bulk of their infosec money and effort on the effective controls, and are minimizing efforts spent on those controls that don’t directly counter real-world threats. After all, the laws and regulations themselves are pretty vague. What counts in the long run is real information security, not blind compliance with inadequate and antiquated baselines. 

Thanks to John Davis for this post.