Tag Archives: compliance

Choosing the Right vCISO Solution for Your Company

Posted on by
Reply

Companies today face increasingly complex cybersecurity challenges that call for expert guidance and comprehensive strategies. Navigating through the myriad of cyber threats without a dedicated security leader is a risk few businesses can afford. However, for startups and mid-sized businesses, where resources are often limited, appointing a full-time Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) might be infeasible. This is where a vCISO, or virtual/fractional CISO, becomes a game-changer.

A vCISO offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, presenting a practical choice for organizations that require expert guidance but have budgetary constraints. With a vCISO, you get the benefits of a chief information security officer’s expertise without the overhead costs associated with a full-time executive. By offering hourly rates or project-based fees, vCISO services provide budget-friendly options tailored to your company’s specific needs.

Startups and medium-sized enterprises can particularly benefit from the rich, diversified experience a vCISO brings—insights forged from working with multiple companies across various industries. For businesses aiming to strengthen their existing security teams or to define security policies and risk assessments, a vCISO can provide valuable support. They can guide the development of effective security strategies tailored to an organization’s risk profile and operational scale.

For organizations in dynamic threat environments or heavily regulated industries where security requirements are stringent, a vCISO’s expertise can be of paramount importance. Moreover, a vCISO can become a valuable asset to your executive team by ensuring that security practices comply with the latest regulations and industry standards.

Overall, if you’re looking to enhance your cybersecurity posture and efforts without committing to a full-time executive, a vCISO could be the key to achieving your long-term strategic security goals.

Factors to Consider When Selecting a vCISO Provider

Identifying the right vCISO provider necessitates a thorough evaluation of several crucial factors:

  • Industry Experience: It’s vital to choose a vCISO with experience relevant to your sector. Familiarity with industry-specific challenges and compliance mandates ensures the vCISO will devise security solutions apt for your unique landscape.
  • Expertise and Track Record: Scrutinize the vCISO’s range of skills and their history with past clients. A well-rounded security expert with a proven record in risk management and security operations adds significant value.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Consider the pricing model carefully. Whether it’s an hourly rate or project-based fee, the vCISO services should align with your financial constraints while delivering high-quality expertise.
  • Company Culture Fit: A vCISO should be able to integrate seamlessly with your organization, communicating across various departments effectively and influencing a robust security culture.
  • Peer Recommendations: Leverage your network to get insights into potential vCISOs. References from other business leaders and cybersecurity professionals can guide you to a provider that will offer the best balance of quality and cost.

Evaluating the Experience and Expertise of Potential vCISOs

The proficiency of a vCISO is underpinned by extensive experience and expertise in the cybersecurity domain. Potential vCISOs should have a wealth of knowledge in constructing and managing a cybersecurity program robust enough to shield against evolving threats. Here’s what to assess:

  • Program Development: Gauge whether the vCISO has experience in developing cybersecurity programs that are both strategic and practical in application.
  • Risk Management: It’s critical that a vCISO can identify, evaluate, and mitigate risks, ensuring your organization is prepared for potential security incidents.
  • Compliance Knowledge: A competent vCISO needs to be abreast of legal standards like GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS, guaranteeing your business meets necessary regulatory demands.
  • Specialized Training and Resources: Look for certifications and training that verify their expertise, such as CISSP, CISM, or CCISO.
  • Being meticulous during the evaluation process will help you find a vCISO who not only possesses the right skills but can also translate complex security matters into strategic business decisions effectively.

Aligning Your Company’s Security Requirements with a vCISO’s Skill Set

The ultimate goal of hiring a vCISO is to address your company’s specific security needs through strategic, informed guidance. Here are the steps to ensure a vCISO’s skills align with your requirements:

  • Certifications and Business Acumen: Ensure the vCISO has relevant certifications coupled with a deep understanding of business strategies and objectives.
  • Availability and Communication: The vCISO should be accessible and possess the communication skills necessary to articulate complex security issues across all levels of the company.
  • Industry-specific Knowledge: Confirm the vCISO’s experiences dovetail with your sector’s demands, delivering cybersecurity advice that is both applicable and actionable.

Choosing the right vCISO involves careful consideration of these factors, ultimately finding someone who will be a formidable inner defense against potential security risks while also helping to grow and mature your company’s overall cybersecurity efforts.

To learn more about MicroSolved’s vCISO offerings, capabilities, and options, drop us a line (info@microsolved.com) or give us a call (614.351.1237). We look forward to speaking with you! 

 

 

* AI tools were used in the research and creation of this content.

ISO/IEC 27001 Firewall Review Compliance With MachineTruth

Posted on by
Reply

Enhancing Information Security with MachineTruth™ Global Configuration Assessment

In the landscape of information security, ISO/IEC 27001 compliance is a cornerstone for safeguarding an organization’s digital assets. A critical aspect of adhering to these standards is the meticulous review of firewall configurations. The introduction of MachineTruth Global Configuration Assessment revolutionizes this vital process through a technologically advanced solution.

MTSOC

 

Understanding the Importance of Firewall Configuration Reviews

To align with ISO/IEC 27001, it’s essential for organizations to implement a robust process for reviewing and approving firewall configurations. MachineTruth enhances this process by employing proprietary analytics and machine learning algorithms to analyze device and application configurations globally, ensuring they meet industry standards while identifying potential vulnerabilities.

Features of MachineTruth Methodology

MachineTruth offers a systematic approach that includes:
– Gathering and analyzing configurations across devices and applications.
– Validating configurations against best practices and known vulnerabilities.
– Maintaining a comprehensive audit trail for accountability and compliance.
– Ensuring regular reviews and updates to stay in line with security policies.

This approach not only streamlines the review process but also significantly enhances an organization’s security posture through data-driven insights and recommendations.

Benefits of Integrating MachineTruth

MachineTruth provides detailed reports and suggested changes by security experts, enabling organizations to:
– Effectively address and remediate identified vulnerabilities.
– Stay updated with the latest firewall technology developments and threats.
– Enhance their information security framework with evidence-based strategies.

Getting Started with MachineTruth

To leverage the full potential of MachineTruth Global Configuration Assessment in your firewall configuration review process, consider the following steps:
1. Contact MSI at info@microsolved.com for an initial consultation.
2. Discuss your organization’s specific needs and requirements to tailor the assessment.
3. Integrate MachineTruth into your security processes with support from our experts.

Embracing MachineTruth not only optimizes the configuration review process but also empowers your organization with cutting-edge security enhancements. Start your journey towards robust information security by reaching out to us today.

 

* AI tools were used in the research and creation of this content.

Meeting PCI-DSS 1.1.7 with MachineTruth Global Configuration Assessments

Posted on by
Reply

Explanation of PCI-DSS requirement 1.1.7

The process for reviewing firewall, router, and network device configurations and rule sets every six months involves several steps to ensure compliance with PCI DSS Requirement 1.1.7 and maintain network security controls and router configuration standards.

Organizations can effectively conduct these reviews by utilizing services such as MachineTruth™ Global Configuration Assessments to analyze the configuration settings of firewalls, switches, routers, applications, and other network devices. By conducting regular audits and involving key personnel from the IT and security teams in the review of the results, organizations can ensure that their network device configurations and rule sets comply with PCI DSS Requirement 1.1.7 and maintain strong network security controls.

FirewallDC

Conequences for failing to meet PCI-DSS 1.1.7

Compliance with PCI-DSS is crucial for maintaining the security and integrity of sensitive payment card information. Failing to meet the requirements of PCI-DSS can have significant implications for a company, including legal and financial consequences.

One specific requirement of PCI-DSS is 1.1.7, which addresses the need to test security systems and processes regularly. Failing to comply with this specific requirement can result in severe penalties, including hefty fines and potential legal action. Companies may also face damage to their reputation and loss of customer trust. In some cases, non-compliance with PCI-DSS requirements may lead to the inability to process payment card transactions, causing significant operational disruptions. Ultimately, the consequences of failing to meet PCI-DSS 1.1.7 can have far-reaching impacts on a company’s bottom line and long-term viability. Therefore, businesses must prioritize and invest in maintaining compliance with PCI-DSS to avoid these detrimental consequences.

Importance of securing inbound traffic

Securing inbound traffic is critical for maintaining the cardholder data environment’s security and integrity, as PCI DSS Requirement 1.2.1 mandates. Organizations can effectively prevent unauthorized access and potential security breaches by limiting inbound and outbound traffic to only what is necessary for the cardholder data environment. Traffic restrictions are crucial in controlling and monitoring data flow into the network, ensuring that only authorized and necessary sources and protocols are allowed entry. This helps to minimize the risk of unauthorized access and potential security breaches, as any unnecessary or unauthorized traffic is blocked from entering the network. By implementing and enforcing these traffic restrictions, organizations can significantly reduce the likelihood of data breaches and maintain compliance with PCI DSS standards. Therefore, organizations must prioritize and effectively secure their inbound traffic to safeguard their cardholder data environment.

Importance of securing outbound traffic

Securing outbound traffic is paramount for protecting an organization’s sensitive information and preventing potential risks such as data breaches, exposure to malware, and unauthorized access to critical data. Unsecured outbound traffic can lead to data leaks, theft of intellectual property, and compromise of confidential information, causing significant financial and reputational damage to the organization.

Implementing egress filtering, encryption, data loss prevention, and threat detection measures can help mitigate and/or minimize these risks. Egress filtering is the single most powerful tool in preventing data exfiltration. By implementing best practices around all network traffic leaving the network or segments, most data exfiltration can be disrupted. Encryption ensures that data transmitted outside the organization’s network is securely ciphered, preventing unauthorized access and data breaches. Data loss prevention tools enable organizations to monitor and control the transfer of sensitive data, thereby reducing the risk of data leaks and unauthorized access. In addition, threat detection methods allow real-time visibility into outbound traffic, enabling prompt detection and response to unauthorized or malicious activities.

By securing outbound traffic through these measures, organizations can significantly reduce the likelihood of data breaches, exposure to malware, and unauthorized access to sensitive information, thus safeguarding their critical assets and maintaining the trust of the card brands and customers.

Description of MachineTruth Global Configuration Assessment capabilities

This assessment leverages MicroSolved’s proprietary analytics and machine learning platform, MachineTruth, to review device and application configurations in mass at a global scale. The assessment compares device configurations against industry standard best practices, known vulnerabilities, and common misconfigurations. It also allows organizations to ensure control homogeny across the enterprise, regardless of using different vendors, products, and versions.

Adopted security standards and security policies can be used as a baseline, and configurations can be compared holistically and globally against these universal security settings. Compensating controls can be identified and cataloged as a part of the assessment if desired.

Various analytics can also be performed as a part of the review, including trusted host hierarchies, reputational analysis of various sources for configured rules and access control lists, flagging of insecure services, identification of deprecated firmware, log management settings, protocols, encryption mechanisms, etc. MachineTruth can hunt down, flag, and provide specific mitigation and configuration advice to ensure these issues are fixed across the enterprise, architectures, and various vendor products.

If needed, the MachineTruth platform can verify network segmentation and serve as proof of these implementations to reduce the compliance scope to a subset of the network and data flows.

How MachineTruth helps organizations meet PCI requirements

MachineTruth Global Configuration Assessments help organizations simplify the process of meeting PCI-DSS 1.1.7 and other relevant regulatory requirements. By working across vendor platforms, and reviewing up to several thousand device configurations simultaneously, even the most complex networks can be reviewed holistically and quickly. Work that would have taken several man-years to perform with traditional methods can be accomplished quickly and with a minimum of resources.

Multi-level reporting also provides for an easy, prioritized path to mitigation of the assessments, and if you need assistance, MicroSolved’s extensive partner network stands ready to help you make the changes across the planet. The output of the assessment includes technical details with mitigations for each finding, a technical manager report with root causes, and suggestions for improvement across the enterprise, as well as an executive summary report that is designed to help upper-level management, boards of directors, auditors, and even business partners performing due diligence, understand the assessment outcome and the state of security throughout the organization’s networks. The reporting is excellent for establishing the true state of network compliance, even on a global scale.

This not only allows organizations to easily and rapidly meet PCI-DSS 1.1.7, but also allows them to quickly harden their networks and increase their security posture at a rate that was nearly impossible in the past. Leveraging the power of AI, machine learning, and analytics, even the most complex organizations can make solving this compliance problem easy.

How to Engage with MicroSolved, Inc.

To learn more about a MachineTruth Global Configuration Assessment or the 30+ years of security expertise of MicroSolved, Inc., just drop us a line at info@microsolved.com. You can also reach us at +1.614.351.1237. Our team of experts will be more than happy to walk through how the platform works and discuss the workflow and costs involved with this unique option for meeting PCI requirements and other relevant regulatory guidance. While MicroSolved is a small firm with more than 30 years in business, some clients prefer to work through our larger partners who are likely already on established vendor lists. This is also possible, and the protocols and contractual arrangements are already in place with a number of globally recognized professional services firms. Whether you choose to work with MicroSolved directly, or through our partner network, you will receive the same excellent service, leading-edge insights and benefit from our proprietary MachineTruth platform.

Decoding the Digital Dilemma: Is a vCISO the Right Move for Your Business?

Posted on by
Reply

In today’s fast-paced digital environment, ensuring robust cybersecurity is crucial for every business. A virtual Chief Information Security Officer (vCISO) may be the strategic addition your company needs. Let’s delve into why a vCISO could be a vital component in strengthening your business’s cyber defenses.

  1. Responding to Increasing Cyber Threats: If your business is witnessing an increase in cyber attacks, both in frequency and complexity, it’s a clear sign that the strategic insight of a vCISO is needed. They bring the necessary expertise to enhance your cybersecurity measures.
  2. Filling the Cybersecurity Expertise Gap: For businesses lacking in-house cybersecurity skills, a vCISO acts as an expert ally. They provide essential knowledge and guidance to strengthen your cyber defenses.
  3. Meeting Compliance and Regulatory Demands: Adhering to industry compliance standards and regulations is critical. A vCISO ensures that your business not only meets these requirements but does so efficiently, avoiding potential legal and financial repercussions.
  4. Economical Cybersecurity Leadership and Flexible Budgeting: If hiring a full-time CISO is not financially viable, a vCISO is a cost-effective solution. They offer top-level cybersecurity leadership and support tailored to your budget. This scalable model means you get expert cybersecurity services without the financial burden of a permanent executive role.
  5. Foundational Cybersecurity Development: A vCISO is key in establishing a solid cybersecurity framework. They are adept at creating policies and strategies customized to your organization’s specific needs, ensuring a robust cybersecurity infrastructure.
  6. Enhancing IT Team Capabilities: A vCISO brings strategic direction to your IT team, providing leadership, training, and mentorship. This enhances their capabilities in managing cyber threats and aligns their efforts with broader business objectives.
  7. Expertise for Specialized Requirements: In scenarios like mergers and acquisitions, a vCISO with specialized experience is invaluable. They skillfully manage the integration of diverse cybersecurity processes, ensuring a unified and secure organizational framework.
  8. Expert Assistance in Cybersecurity Compliance: Our services extend to comprehensive cybersecurity compliance support. With expertise in various industry regulations, we ensure your business adheres to necessary standards, safeguarding against emerging threats and regulatory changes.
  9. MicroSolved vCISO Services – Customized for Your Business: MicroSolved’s vCISO services are designed for Small and Midsized Businesses (SMBs), providing expert cybersecurity guidance. Our team offers effective, cost-efficient solutions, eliminating the need for a full-time CISO.

Given the dynamic nature of cyber threats today, having a vCISO can be a strategic move for your business. To learn more about how MicroSolved’s vCISO services can enhance your cybersecurity posture, we invite you to contact us for a detailed consultation (info@microsolved.com) or by phone (614.351.1237).

 

* Just to let you know, we used AI tools to gather the information for this article.

 

Maximize Your Cybersecurity: Discover How a Virtual CISO Can Transform Your Business Security Strategy

Posted on by
Reply

What is a vCISO?

A vCISO, virtual CISO, or virtual Chief Information Security Officer is a highly qualified cybersecurity expert who provides IT security and compliance services on a contractual basis. Unlike a full-time CISO, a vCISO works remotely and collaborates with an organization’s executive team to protect against security threats and ensure compliance with industry regulations.

As a cybersecurity expert, a vCISO brings years of experience and a wide range of skills. They deeply understand security practices, threat landscapes, and industry standards. With this knowledge, they can assess an organization’s security posture, identify potential gaps and risks, and develop a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy.

A vCISO’s role is to provide unbiased advice and guidance to the organization’s leadership team. They work closely with the executive team to align security objectives with business goals. VCISOs can help establish and implement security policies, compliance standards, and best practices by leveraging their technical expertise and industry knowledge.

By hiring a vCISO on a contractual basis, organizations gain access to a team of experts without the commitment of a full-time hire. This flexible and cost-effective approach allows businesses to benefit from the expertise of a seasoned professional while optimizing their security program. Ultimately, a vCISO helps organizations enhance their security posture and proactively mitigate cyber threats.

What does a virtual Chief Information Security Officer do?

A virtual Chief Information Security Officer (vCISO) plays a critical role in assisting organizations in developing and managing their information security program. One of the primary responsibilities of a vCISO is to create and implement a comprehensive security strategy for the organization. This includes identifying and prioritizing security threats, developing security policies and procedures, and establishing security controls to mitigate risks.

In addition to creating the security strategy, a vCISO coordinates and manages security audits conducted within the organization. They work closely with internal and external auditors to ensure the organization’s security practices and controls meet regulatory requirements and industry standards. This involves conducting risk assessments, reviewing security controls, and implementing necessary changes to enhance the organization’s security posture.

Furthermore, a vCISO evaluates third-party vendors and assesses their security capabilities. They ensure that third parties comply with the organization’s security requirements and implement necessary security measures to protect its data and systems from potential risks.

A crucial part of a vCISO’s role is presenting the organization’s security posture to stakeholders, such as the executive team and board members. They regularly update the organization’s security posture, including identified vulnerabilities or emerging threats. This helps stakeholders make informed decisions regarding the organization’s security investments and priorities.

A vCISO plays a vital role in helping organizations build a robust and effective information security program by fulfilling these responsibilities. They bring their expertise to develop a comprehensive security strategy, coordinate audits, evaluate third parties, and present the organization’s security posture to stakeholders.

Learning More

In conclusion, navigating the complex cybersecurity landscape can be daunting for any organization. However, partnering with a seasoned virtual Chief Information Security Officer (vCISO) can significantly enhance your security posture and ensure compliance with the latest industry standards. This is where MicroSolved comes into play. With our extensive experience and deep expertise in cybersecurity, we offer tailored vCISO services designed to meet your unique needs and challenges. Let us help you fortify your defenses, mitigate risks, and secure your digital assets effectively. Don’t wait for a security breach to realize the importance of expert guidance. Contact MicroSolved today and take a proactive step towards a more secure and resilient future.

 

* Just to let you know, we used some AI tools to gather the information for this article, and we polished it up with Grammarly to make sure it reads just right!

Let’s Talk About Audit Logs

Posted on by
Reply

CIS Control 8: Audit Log Management

Data is at the core of every business in today’s digital age. Protecting that data is of paramount importance. For this reason, the Center for Internet Security (CIS) developed the CIS Controls to provide a comprehensive framework for cybersecurity best practices.

One of these controls, CIS Control 8, focuses specifically on audit log management. This control aims to ensure that all events and security-related information are recorded and retained in an audit log for a defined period.

This article will explore the importance of audit log management as a fundamental component of any organization’s security posture. We will examine the CIS Control 8 safeguard requirements and industry-standard best practices for audit log management.

By following the procedures outlined in this article, organizations can improve their security posture, meet all CIS CSC version 8 safeguards, and ensure compliance with industry standards.

Why audit log management is essential

Audit log management is essential for every organization that wants to ensure its data security. The reason is simple: audit logs provide a comprehensive record of all events and security-related information that occurs within a system. This information is critical for incident response, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Without audit logs, organizations would have no way of knowing who accessed what information, when or how the incident happened, or whether unauthorized users or suspicious activity occurred.

In addition to aiding in incident response and threat detection, audit log management also supports compliance with industry regulations and guidelines. Many compliance requirements mandate that organizations maintain a record of all activity that occurs on their systems. Failing to comply with these requirements can result in significant legal and financial penalties. Therefore, organizations prioritizing data security must take audit log management seriously and implement practices that meet their data security needs and safeguard requirements.

Best practices for audit log management

Audit log management is critical to an organization’s data security efforts. To ensure that your audit log management practices meet the CIS CSC version 8 guidelines and safeguard requirements, consider implementing the following best practices:

1. Define the audit log requirements: Assess the audit log requirements for your organization based on industry regulations, guidelines, and best practices. Define the data to be logged, audit events, and retention periods.

2. Establish audit policies and procedures: Develop audit policies and procedures that align with your organization’s requirements. Ensure these policies and procedures are implemented consistently across all systems and devices.

3. Secure audit logs: Audit logs should be collected, stored, and protected securely to prevent unauthorized access or tampering. Only authorized personnel should have access to audit logs.

4. Monitor and review audit logs: Regularly monitor and review audit logs for anomalies, suspicious activity, and security violations. This includes monitoring for unauthorized access attempts, changes to access rights, and software installations.

5. Configure audit logging settings: Ensure audit logs capture essential system information and user activity information. Configure audit logging settings to generate records of critical security controls, including attempts to gain unauthorized access or make unauthorized changes to the network.

6. Generate alerts: Configure the system to generate real-time alerts for critical events. This includes alerts for security violations, unauthorized access attempts, changes to access rights, and software installations.

7. Regularly test audit log management controls: Ensure audit log management controls are consistently implemented and reviewed. Conduct regular testing to ensure they are effective and meet your organization’s audit log requirements.

Organizations can establish a strong framework for incident response, threat detection, and compliance monitoring by implementing these best practices for audit log management. This will help safeguard against unauthorized access, malicious activity, and other security breaches, prevent legal and financial penalties, and maintain trust levels with clients and partners.

Audit log management policies

To establish audit log management policies that meet CIS CSC version 8 guidelines and safeguard requirements, organizations should follow the following sample policy:

1. Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to establish the principles for collecting, monitoring, and auditing all system and user activity logs to ensure compliance with industry regulations, guidelines, and best practices.

2. Scope: This policy applies to all employees, contractors, equipment, and facilities within the organization, including all workstations, servers, and network devices used in processing or storing sensitive or confidential information.

3. Policy:

– All computer systems and devices must generate audit logs that capture specified audit events, including user logins and accesses, system configuration changes, application accesses and modifications, and other system events necessary for detecting security violations, troubleshooting, and compliance monitoring.

– Audit logs must be generated in real-time and stored in a secure, centralized location that is inaccessible to unauthorized users.

– The retention period for audit logs must be at least 90 days, or longer if law or regulation requires.

– Only authorized personnel with appropriate access rights and clearances can view audit logs. Access to audit logs must be audited and reviewed regularly by the Information Security team.

– Audit logs must be reviewed regularly to identify patterns of suspicious activity, security violations, or potential security breaches. Any unauthorized access or security violation detected in the audit logs must be reported immediately to the Information Security team.

– Audit log management controls, and procedures must be tested periodically to ensure effectiveness and compliance with CIS CSC version 8 guidelines and safeguard requirements.

4. Enforcement: Failure to comply with this policy may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment or contract. All violations must be reported to the Information Security team immediately.

By implementing the above policy, organizations can ensure they meet the audit log management standards set forth by CIS CSC version 8 guidelines and safeguard requirements. This will help organizations prevent unauthorized access, malicious activity, and data breaches, maintain compliance with industry regulations, and protect the integrity and confidentiality of sensitive or confidential information.

Audit log management procedures

Here are the audit log management procedures that establish best practices for performing the work of this control:

I. Initial Setup

– Determine which audit events will be captured in the logs based on industry regulations, guidelines, and best practices.

– Configure all computer systems and devices to capture the specified audit events in the logs.

– Establish a secure, centralized location for storing the logs that is inaccessible to unauthorized users.

II. Ongoing Operations

– Set the logs to generate in real time.

– Monitor the logs regularly to detect security violations, troubleshoot, and monitor compliance.

– Ensure only authorized personnel with appropriate access rights can view the logs.

– Review the logs regularly to identify patterns of suspicious activity, security violations, or potential security breaches.

– Immediately report any unauthorized access or security violation detected in the logs to the Information Security team.

– Retain log data for at least 90 days, or longer if required by law or regulation.

III. Testing and Evaluation

– Test the audit log management controls and procedures periodically.

– Ensure that all testing and evaluation are conducted in compliance with CIS CSC version 8 guidelines and safeguard requirements.

By following these audit log management procedures, organizations can establish best practices for performing the work of this control and ensure that all system and user activities are properly monitored and audited. This will help organizations maintain compliance with industry regulations, prevent unauthorized access, and protect sensitive or confidential information from data breaches.

 

*This article was written with the help of AI tools and Grammarly.

Compliance-Based Infosec Vs Threat-Based Infosec

Posted on by
Reply

In the world of Information Security (infosec), there are two main philosophies: compliance-based infosec and threat-based infosec. Compliance-based infosec means meeting a set of written security standards designed to fulfill some goal such as the requirements of statute law or financial information privacy requirements. Threat-based infosec, on the other hand, means applying information security controls in reaction to (or anticipation of) threats that organizations currently (or soon will) face. 

Compliance-based infosec is generally applied smoothly across the organization. In other words, all the security controls mandated in the security standard must be put in place by the organization, and the relative effectiveness of each control is largely ignored. In contrast, security controls are applied in a hierarchical manner in threat-based infosec. The most effective or greatly needed security controls are applied first according to the threats that are most likely to occur or that will cause the most damage to the organization if they do occur. 

The difference is sort of like the defensive strategy of the Chinese versus that of the Normans in post-conquest England. The Chinese built very long walls that went from one end of their territory to the other. Their goal was to keep out all invaders everywhere. This is a grand idea, but takes a very large amount of resources to implement and maintain. In practice, it takes tons of men and infrastructure and the defensive capabilities at any one place are spread thin. The Normans in England, on the other hand, built strong castles with many layers of defense in strategic locations where the threats were greatest and where it was easiest to support neighboring castles. In practice, there are fewer defenses at any one point, but the places where defenses are implemented are very strong indeed. Both of these strategies have merit, and are really driven by the particular set of circumstances faced by the defender. But which is better for your organization? Let’s look at compliance-based infosec first.

Compliance-based infosec, when implemented correctly, is really the best kind of defense there is. The problem is, the only place I’ve ever seen it really done right is in the military. In military information security, failure to protect private information can lead to death and disaster. Because of this, no expense or inconvenience is spared when protecting this information. Everything is compartmentalized and access is strictly based on need to know. Every system and connection is monitored, and there are people watching your every move. There are rules and checklists for everything and failure to comply is severely punished. In addition, finding better ways to protect information are sought after, and those that come up with valuable ideas are generously rewarded.

This is not the way compliance-base infosec works in the private sector, or even in non-military government agencies. First, statute law is tremendously vague when discussing implementing information security. Laws make broad statements such as “personal health information will be protected from unauthorized access or modification”. Fine. So a group of people get together and write up a body of regulations to further spell out the requirements organizations need to meet to comply with the law. Unfortunately, you are still dealing with pretty broad brush strokes here. To try to get a handle on things, agencies and auditors rely on information security standards and guidelines such as are documented in NIST or ISO. From these, baseline standards and requirements are set down. The problems here are many. First, baseline standards are minimums. They are not saying “it’s best if you do this”, they are saying “you will at least do this”. However, typical organizations, (which generally have very limited infosec budgets), take these baseline standards as goals to be strived for, not starting points. They very rarely meet baseline standards, let alone exceed them. Also, NIST and ISO standards are not very timely. The standards are only updated occasionally, and they are not very useful for countering new and rapidly developing threats. So, unless your organization is really serious about information security and has the money and manpower to make it work, I would say compliance-based infosec is not for you. I know that many organizations (such as health care and financial institutions) are required to meet baseline standards, but remember what happened to Target last year. They were found to be compliant with the PCI DSS, but still had tens of millions of financial records compromised.

Now let’s look at threat-based infosec. To implement a threat-based information security program, the organization first looks at the information assets they need to protect, the threats and vulnerabilities that menace them and the consequences that will ensue if those information assets are actually compromised (basic asset inventory and risk assessment). They then prioritize the risks they face and decide how to implement security controls in the most effective and efficient way to counter those particular risks. That might mean implementing strong egress filtering and log monitoring as opposed to buying the fanciest firewall. Or it might mean doing something simple like ensuring that system admins use separate access credentials for simple network access and administrative access to the system. Whatever controls are applied, they are chosen to solve particular problems, not to meet some broad baseline that is designed to meet generally defined problems. Also, threat-based infosec programs are much better at anticipating and preparing for emerging threats, since reassessments of the security program are made whenever there are significant changes in the system or threat picture.

These are the reasons that I think most of us in non-military organizations should go with threat-based infosec programs. Even those organizations that must meet regulatory requirements can ensure that they are spending the bulk of their infosec money and effort on the effective controls, and are minimizing efforts spent on those controls that don’t directly counter real-world threats. After all, the laws and regulations themselves are pretty vague. What counts in the long run is real information security, not blind compliance with inadequate and antiquated baselines. 

Thanks to John Davis for this post.

Touchdown Task for June: Document Cleanup

Posted on by
2

With the beginning of a new fiscal year on the immediate horizon for many, it reminds us that it’s time to clean up our books and our filing. And by that we mean both our digital and physical files! If you don’t already have a written document retention policy, one needs to be drafted. It should be tailored to your business needs and meet the requirements identified in local, state or federal laws and regulations that apply to your particular industry. 

As a part of your document retention plan, you will establish a document retention schedule of what to keep and for how long. Once you have this identified, it’s time to dive into the files, both paper and electronic, to see what should be properly destructed. 

It is critical that paper documents are either incinerated or shredded. Electronic files must be properly sanitized and purged. Purging can be accomplished a variety of secure erasing tools. A quick Google will turn up several free or low cost solutions. Clearing electronic data is often accomplished by overwriting existing data using software that incorporates a fixed sequence of characters. 
Whatever the processes are that you elect to perform, it is imperative that you stick to the schedule and destroy your documents per your written guidelines in your document retention policy.

Thanks to Teresa West for this post.

MSI Strategies & Tactics Talk Episode 5: Is Compliance-centric Security The Way To Go?

Posted on by
Reply

“Compliance-centric security is bleeding us dry.” – Brent Huston, CEO and Security Evangelist for MSI

Listen in as our tech team discusses compliance-centric security, including:

  • What is compliance-centric security?
  • Why is it a problem?
  • How it creates a “do-the-minimum mentality”
  • What is the alternative to compliance-centric security?

Panelists:

Brent Huston, CEO and Security Evangelist, MicroSolved, Inc.
Adam Hostetler, Network Engineer and Security Analyst
Phil Grimes, Security Analyst
John Davis, Risk Management Engineer
Mary Rose Maguire, Moderator, Marketing Communication Specialist, MicroSolved, Inc.

Click the embedded player to listen. Or click this link to access downloads. Stay safe!

What Helps You with PCI?

Posted on by
Reply

Yesterday, at RSA much press attention was paid to a metric that 41% of all organizations tested needed temporary compensating controls to meet even the minimum security provided by PCI DSS compliance.

This led us to this discussion. If so many organizations need temporary controls to do the minimum, then what controls, in your experience, are the most worthwhile for those struggling to meet PCI?

Please leave a comment and tell us what controls you find most useful, easiest to leverage and worth the investment for PCI compliance.

As always, thanks for reading and we look forward to your input.